US-Pakistani Aid: A Conflicted Relationship?

A recent report, on the progress of a $7.5 billion aid package to Pakistan suggests that aid has failed to achieve some of its primary goals.  In the report, the USAID Inspector General states that some programs have “made little progress in achieving [their] main goal[s] of social and economic stabilization to counter the growing influence of extremist and terrorist groups”.

The report, released by USAID, the US State Department and Department of Defense, comes not long after questions have risen regarding Pakistani government’s willingness to deal with terrorists and insurgents.  To add to matters, there was also the recent suspension of bilateral relations between the US and Pakistan following the detainment of Raymond Davis, who recently shot and killed two Pakistanis but is allegedly covered by diplomatic immunity.  This incident is an accurate reflection the conflicted relationship between the US and Pakistan, and the difficulty of short term problems in the face of long term goals.

Key points arising from the report:

  • Lack of results can be attributed to the lack of adequate numbers of staff and a “hostile environment” characterized by kidnappings and harassment of the implementing partner staff.
  • The lack of progress could be in part attributed to “the mission’s inadequate monitoring and oversight”.
  • The USAID Inspector General noted that investigations taking place into implementing organizations following “serious corporate misconduct, mismanagement, and a lack of internal controls”.
  • The US Embassy in Islamabad has failed to develop a core set of illustrative indicators for development progress.

This lack of progress may cause problems in Pakistan where anti-American sentiment is strong and there is a suspicion of corruption in U.S. aid donations.  The U.S. government has reportedly given $18 billion in aid packages to Pakistan since the September 11th terrorist attacks.  However, it seems that  in Pakistan there have been few tangible results. The Wall Street Journal also notes that aid flows to Pakistan have found it difficult to achieve the goal of improving America’s image to Pakistan’s citizens.  It reports that veteran diplomat Richard Holbrooke died in December after ordering an entire overhaul of the current system of aid distribution in Pakistan, with the intension of addressing what he perceived as the frustrating problem of a perception that refuses to change.

The $7.5 billion package, passed by Congress in late-2009, has attempted to take a new approach by routing money directly through Pakistani agencies and institutions, with the intention to create more visible results, such as roads, schools, electricity networks and health care.  Unfortunately, this has not strengthened Pakistani institutions as it was intended, which seems largely attributable to what many scholars describe as the power of the military in government affairs, whereby the elected government itself has relatively little policy influence.

As only the first part of this 5 year plan has been implemented, the test of time will determine its over success or failure in the end.  The report comes at an appropriate time for reform following the changes that will be made to aid through the QDDR.  Perhaps Pakistan represents an opportunity for USAID to offer a clear illustration of the QDDR reforms.


One thought on “US-Pakistani Aid: A Conflicted Relationship?

  1. neel123 February 23, 2011 / 5:19 pm

    US-Pakistan relations is decades old, runs much deeper than meets the eyes. A casual follower of global politics would fail to see that the Americans are playing a dangerous game in this strategically important region. Their objectives are two fold.

    First, to use Pakistan to do their dirty works. They basically outsource their works to Pakistan, in exchange of tens of billions of dollars in economic and military aid. It was a win win for them for a long time.

    Second and most important objective is to balance out a rising India with Pakistan, while encouraging India to be a counter weight to China. In addition they need to find a way to neutralize the Muslim terrorist, who would have nuclear bombs passed onto them, only a matter of time.

    It is a win all the way for the American policies in the region as this would boost their arms sales, while taking care of their strategic objectives. They do not want to see a winner in the region, India included.

    In the worst case, they would lose Pakistan’s services, but the Americans would make sure that in the event of any conflict in the region, destruction is maximized. That is why they continue to provide Pakistan billions of dollars, even when their relations is not good.

    And the worst part is, they are now finding a way for India to get drawn into dealing with the monster they once created with the help of Pakistan. Now nuclear Pakistan is clearly out of their control, so are the Muslim terrorists targeting the west. The Americans would love to see Pakistan wiped out in a nuclear conflict, while India would be destroyed to a great extent….. serves their purpose perfectly …. !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s